Pilot and pricing
Start with a focused pilot
Together we choose one concrete planning question. You then receive a proposal covering scope, timing and cost. A pilot is normally paid and only starts once the agreements are clear.
Test first
From a broad question to one workable trial
Routeez is introduced step by step. We do not try to change your entire organisation at once, but first bound what we can honestly test and evaluate.
After discovery, you decide based on a written proposal. Nothing starts without agreement on work, timing and cost.
-
Discovery
We discuss the current process, the first problem you want to solve and who decides.
-
Proposal
You receive a written proposal covering scope, timing, cost, data and review criteria.
-
Trial
Planners compare proposals with their current method and control publication.
-
Review
Together we decide whether to stop, adjust or expand deliberately.
Always included
Every pilot has the same clear foundation
- Discovery of one concrete planning problem
- A written proposal covering scope, timing and cost
- Planners retain control over every proposal
- A joint review: stop, adjust or expand
Examples
Which situation looks like yours?
These are recognisable starting situations, not fixed packages. We define the final pilot together.
-
One team
One team, one area
For a practice or care team that wants visits and routes in one shared view.
What we test firstTest one working day or route with the people who plan it every day.- Scheduling, routes and availability
- One area and fixed core rules
- Simple import of starting data
-
Several teams or rounds
Several rounds or teams
For a care organisation coordinating several teams, or a lab with recurring sample rounds.
What we test firstPlan one recurring round or several teams together and make exceptions visible.- Rules by route, team or area
- Central view of demand and capacity
- Recurring rounds and exceptions
-
Collaboration and integrations
Collaboration and integration
For a group sharing capacity or an organisation connecting intake and planning to existing systems.
What we test firstBound one collaboration or data flow before integrating or rolling out more broadly.- Collaboration across teams or organisations
- Discovery of imports, APIs and ownership
- Integrations within an agreed scope
How pricing is shaped
What affects the price
We price what is needed to run the agreed trial carefully. Scope, rules, data and guidance make the main difference.
Teams and routes
More teams, roles and areas require more setup and alignment.
Planning rules
Time windows, skills, continuity and exceptions determine how much planning logic must be tested.
Data and integrations
Starting-data quality and any integrations determine much of the technical work.
Guidance
A self-directed team needs less guidance than a rollout involving several teams or organisations.
Differences by situation
What becomes more complex as the scope grows?
We group only the differences that genuinely affect an initial conversation. Technical detail follows when it becomes relevant.
Teams and areas
How many people and areas are included in the first trial?
Planning and routes
Which rules, recurring patterns and exceptions must demonstrably work?
Data and integrations
How do we get reliable starting data into Routeez without integrating everything immediately?
Guidance and next steps
Who do we guide during the pilot and what happens after the review?
Teams and areas
How many people and areas are included in the first trial?
One team
- What we test first
- One team
- Who decides
- The planner
Several teams or rounds
- What we test first
- Several teams or rounds
- Who decides
- Planner and team lead
Collaboration and integrations
- What we test first
- One collaboration or data flow
- Who decides
- Every involved organisation
Planning and routes
Which rules, recurring patterns and exceptions must demonstrably work?
One team
- Planning rules
- Fixed core rules
- Exceptions
- Planner adjusts
Several teams or rounds
- Planning rules
- By team, round or area
- Exceptions
- Visible by team or round
Collaboration and integrations
- Planning rules
- With agreements between parties
- Exceptions
- Confirmed by involved parties
Data and integrations
How do we get reliable starting data into Routeez without integrating everything immediately?
One team
- Starting data
- Calendar, addresses and availability
- Integrations
- Not needed for the first trial
Several teams or rounds
- Starting data
- Adds teams, rounds and exceptions
- Integrations
- After technical discovery
Collaboration and integrations
- Starting data
- Adds roles, processes and sources
- Integrations
- Within an explicitly agreed scope
Guidance and next steps
Who do we guide during the pilot and what happens after the review?
One team
- Guidance
- Pilot start and review
- After the pilot
- Stop, adjust or expand
Several teams or rounds
- Guidance
- Adds planners and team leads
- After the pilot
- Continue gradually by team
Collaboration and integrations
- Guidance
- Adds governance and integration
- After the pilot
- Phase by partner and integration
Clear expectations
What your proposal does and does not establish
The proposal gives
- A clear initial pilot scope
- Timing, cost and responsibilities
- Which data and people are needed
The proposal does not promise
- An automatic commitment to a broad rollout
- A guaranteed outcome before the pilot
- Unlimited integrations outside the agreed scope
Frequently asked questions
Why is there no fixed price?
Is a pilot free?
What information is needed for an estimate?
Are integrations included?
Discuss your first pilot
Tell us which planning problem you want to test first. We bring scope, timing and cost together in a clear proposal.
Discuss a pilot